EXPLAINER: Looking at toxic tropes in women characters and how they are examined

Both modern and classical stories have represented women as either the virtuous virginal figure or the seductive temptress. Now there are more options for women, however many of those options still fall into toxic tropes. Besides being seen as lazy storytelling, these tropes continue to harm the real-life treatment of women today.

Here are three familiar tropes in movies that are still very much present in media today.

The “I’m not like other girls” stereotype trope implies that women are inferior unless they shed “inherently feminine” attributes. Inherently feminine means whatever that culture defines as feminine, like an interest in make-up, wearing heels, watching reality TV or enjoying pop music. This trope turns internalized misogyny into a character and pits women against one another.

The rise of this trope in the media began when women became a more significant part of public life in the United States, and society divided women into dependent or independent categories. An independent woman will have more masculine qualities because independence is a male-dominated trait. Films in the 90s and 00s modernized this trope.

The “cool girl” is similar to the “I’m not like other girls” woman like in the films “There’s Something About Mary” (1998), “Transformers” (2007) and “Deadpool” (2016). The women in these films are constructed for the male fantasy because they are effortlessly beautiful and have “inherently masculine” traits while still remaining unthreatening. “Gone Girl” (2014) explicitly subverts this trope when “cool girl” Amy rips into her perceived identity.

The difference between showing less represented portrayals of womanhood like Mia from “The Princess Diaries” (2001) and Katniss from “The Hunger Games” (2012) the film explicitly celebrating this trope like Gracie from “Miss Congeniality” (2000) and Andy from “The Devil Wears Prada” (2006). In the latter two films, while this trope is a core element of the three protagonists, each addresses this internalized misogyny as a part of their character’s journey. That cannot be said for every version of the “I’m not like other girls” women.

This trope has its own set of subgenres like the “prostitute with a heart of gold” and “funny fat woman” who is surprisingly horny.” These variants relay the same message as the central trope: people like you are not expected to be this way, and you subvert it. Women of color rarely portray these characters because they are inherently othered and different because they are not white.

The bottom line is that no one is genuinely like other people because everyone is different. When this is applied to someone because they are not a cis-white, middle-class man, it limits how others imagine the character.

This character usually has a strong moral compass, a natural nurturer, talented and endures hardships. She is often asexual, even if she is a mother.

This trope began to combat the common negative stereotypes that trapped Black women into roles like the Mammy, the Jezebel and the Magical Negro. To subvert these tropes, the Strong Black Woman became one that combined all of the other women under the guise of empowerment. This balance can mean a thin line between the character slipping into becoming the Angry Black Woman or Sassy Black Woman or the Sapphire, depending on if this strength advocates for herself or others (especially if they are white).

Films that employ these tropes include “Ghost” (1990), “The Help” (2011) and “The Color Purple” (1985). Black women are more likely to be nominated for individual acting awards for films that embody this version of the trope.

The superhumans and servitude of this trope persist more frequently for darker-skinned Black women. People perceive lighter-skinned women with more European features as more delicate and feminine. The racist trope and its colorist, featurist and texturist variants continue to negatively impact Black women in real life and uphold systemic inequality.

“The Strong Black Woman” trope persists in Black children and young adults in the media too. In the 2017 report “Girlhood Interrupted: The Erasure of Black Girls’ Childhood,” the authors write that the “adulitification” of Black girls originates from slavery with the stereotypes of emasculation, anger, hypersexualization, and nurturing.

Films that do not challenge this trope and continue to portray Black women as unbreakable and resilient reinforce the idea that trauma and hardships can be overcome by pulling up one’s bootstraps. This trope does not address structural inequalities that force Black girls to grow up faster and Black women ever to endure. It tells Black women that their success is them not working hard enough.

Like other tropes, films subvert the Strong Black Woman by rounding out their characters and having more nuance. Having these characters be vulnerable like Annalise in “How to Get Away with Murder” and/or morally questionable like Mia in “Little Fires Everywhere” pushes against the trope’s core attributes. However, these characters are found more predominantly in television series.

This trope portrays a woman who is (according to European beauty standards)”extremely attractive” and is also extremely stupid. Characters like Karen from “Mean Girls” (2004) and Madison from “Zombieland: Double Tap” (2019) are all examples of this. The trope also has a masculine counterpart (“The Himbo”).

This trope is one of the “other girls” from the not like other girls trope because she is two-dimensional and only cares about her appearance. In this way, the bimbo is another trope that pits women against one another.

This trope’s common trait is blonde hair and then has the added layer of becoming the “dumb blonde.” Some films have aimed to subvert this, like “Clueless” (1995), “Legally Blonde” (2001) and “The House Bunny” (2008). While some women were able to capitalize on this toxic trope like Marylin Monroe, Pamela Anderson and Paris Hilton, others experience hostile environments when others make jokes at their expense because of misrepresentation leading to misogyny.

Like other tropes, this is most often in films where telling a succinct story is more imperative and therefore, short-cuts (like lazy tropes) are more likely to be employed. TV shows like “Veronica Mars” and “Buffy the Vampire Slayer” challenged this trope at a time when shows like “Beauty and the Geek” sought to profit off the trope. Unlike other tropes, the bimbo has seen a rapid decline as younger audiences are more supportive of sex-work, modeling and different positions in which women choose to use beauty as a means of gaining capital. Media reflecting this shift include Cece from the show “New Girl” and the film “Hustlers” (2019). 

Related tropes: The Jezebel, Dumb Blonde, The Mean Girl, the Spicy Latina, The Jewish American Princess

These tropes and others are not exclusive to the medium of film and television. Music, books (including graphic novels) and social media bios all have traces of these tropes and more. Their presence in one’s favorite movie or show does not make that media worthless or not worth reviewing. 

To examine representation quality, media critics have developed rubrics to more objectively analyze these texts. These are some of the more prominent examples in media discourse:

First appearing in the 1985 queer comic “Dykes To Watch Out For,” the Bechdel-Wallace Test(commonly referred to as the Bechdel Test) interrogates the way women are shown in movies and asks three questions.

  • Are there two or more women with names? 
  • Do they speak with each other? 
  • Is this about something other than a man?

This test does not determine how feminist a film is or how good it is, just if women have a presence on screen. Critics scrutinize the quiz for its lack of nuance. However, people still recognized the test as an essential conversation starter regarding women’s representation on screen. In 2013, Swedish theaters started adding a Bechdel test rating to highlight gender representation in film.

ILLUSTRATION: Self portrait of Alison Bechdel. Illustration courtesy of Alison Bechdel.
Self portrait of Alison Bechdel. Illustration courtesy of Alison Bechdel.

This fan-created rubric is one of the first prominent challenges of the “Bechdel Test” that attempted to provide an alternative. In 2013, a Tumblr user felt that the character of Mako Mori on “Pacific Rim” (2013) exhibited a strong story arch, but was stunned to learn the film had not passed the “Bechdel Test.” To pass this test, a film must have a woman character with her story arc that does not support a man’s story arc.

Building on the Bechdel Test’s foundation, FiveThirtyEight took the top 50 movies of 2016 and not only measured them by the Bechdel Test but 12 variations. These variations look at behind-the-camera representation, intersectional elements, details of the supporting cast’s protagonist, and details. Some of these tests directly address toxic tropes involving women of color.

Most of the 50 films passed some of the tests, but none passed The Uphold Test or The Villalobos Test. The Uphold Test’s (whose only parameter was an on-set crew of 50% women) closest successes were “Moana” and “Arrival” because women made up 40% of the crew. The Villalobos Test parameters include a Latina lead and the lead (or another Latina character) being shown as professional or college-educated, speaking in unaccented English, and is not sexualized. The test included the voice actors of animated films.

The researchers expressed frustrations on the limitations of not exploring sexuality as a test and stated that “good representation” cannot be determined by a test or two.

Of the 50 films reviewed, “Bad Moms” passed the most tests by passing 8 out of 13 individual tests.  

Launched on International Women’s Day in 2018, The Kent Test is named after its creator Clarkisha Kent and examines “adequate representation of femmes of color.” A significant difference between this and previous tests is that it has seven questions and uses a graded spectrum rather than the 1-3 questions that ues pass/fail options.

While each offer ways to critically examine the recurring tropes and stereotypes about women in media, none provide the viewer with a perfect marker for good representation. They each are a jumping-off point.

To learn about more tropes in media, The Take has created “The Tropes, Explained Series.” See the reports published by The University of Southern California’s Annenberg Inclusion Initiative(since 2007) showing disparities in different media by gender, race and sexual orientation.

Leave A Reply

Your email address will not be published.