EDITORIAL: UHCL is long overdue for a student center
Winston Churchill once said, “We shape our buildings, and afterwards, our buildings shape us.”
Since 2014, UHCL leadership implemented broad changes making the once upper-level university more like other traditional four-year universities. This includes the downward expansion for freshmen and sophomore students in Fall 2014, the addition of the Recreation & Wellness Center in Fall 2018 and Hunter Hall in 2019. While these additions change the university’s culture for the better, UHCL is still missing the mark. The 47-year-old university is long overdue for a student center, which will transform UHCL from an academic necessity to a home.
In the realm of higher education, UHCL’s lack of a student center risks great loss of major student recruitment, student engagement and offers a fatal wound to the university’s supposed commitment to its students. Without a student center, UHCL risks shaming itself as it sacrifices student engagement, muddies its master plan into unclear territories and continues as the only Houston area university without such a vital building.
The features of the center vary based on the university, but generally student centers are a place of leisure that provide students with lounges, dining facilities, and settings for recreation and social gatherings like meetings or conferences. Student centers also might feature unique amenities such as prayer rooms, music and entertainment areas, among others. At the heart of their being, student centers are the only buildings on college campuses that prioritize student engagement and campus life for all students. Student centers have long been hubs for school spirit, student engagement and recruitment. For instance, the University of Houston’s two student centers (Student Center North and Student Center South) are prominent landmarks for prospective students visiting the campus.
A university of UHCL’s size lacking a student center is extremely uncommon, especially within the Houston area. Every university in the University of Houston System has a student center except UHCL. Moreover, the north, central and south campuses of San Jacinto College all have student centers, as do Texas A&M Galveston and College of the Mainland.
Despite what UHCL leadership wants the public to believe, UHCL is still a commuter school. The university’s commuter students, which still make up the majority of its population, do not always remain on campus after classes. This hinders UHCL’s ability to have high levels of engagement for greater student involvement.
Students waiting between classes usually must choose between sitting at tables in the hallways or completely leaving campus – the antithesis of what is seen on campuses with student centers.
Studies show student centers increase engagement and college spirit because of their ability to keep students more interested in being on campus by providing a space for students to stay between classes and enjoy on campus life.
While UHCL’s Recreation & Wellness Center and the SSCB Student Lounge help to a degree in achieving what student centers should, these separate buildings represent components of a student center that do not equal even half of all a student center usually encompasses.
UHCL’s Master Plan includes a student center, with the location for it already determined. UHCL having a student center is more than just prospective – it’s simply a door waiting to be opened. The construction of the student center (or campus center as it is called in the Master Plan) is part of the first phase in the plan. Despite this, other buildings like the Recreation & Wellness Center have been completed first, with the Recreation & Wellness Center being part of Phase 2. While the residential hall is also part of Phase 1, the decision to delay planning for a student center is an illogical choice. The impact a student center would have on cultivating student life would only increase a desire for students to live on campus and want to utilize buildings like the Recreation & Wellness Center.
Questions surrounding the funding are warranted. Like many auxiliary buildings, the center would be partially paid for by students as part of their tuition fees. While students might feel that charging for the student center is unfair, as they will have graduated by the time the center is finished, this is standard practice. Students currently benefit from previously student-funded buildings such as the Recreation & Wellness Center and SSCB buildings.
Because it will be funded by and designed based on current students, UHCL’s student center will represent something its contemporary students had a hand in creating; it should be a source of great pride. Just as a student center is a vital part of college culture, tuition and fees going toward future buildings is a natural part of student life.
With UHCL moving forward with new initiatives much younger than the Master Plan, there is no excuse for the university to not begin the production of such an essential aspect of its downward expansion.
With UHCL continuing to follow its Master Plan, the day will come when the referendum for the student center is proposed, and so comes the time for the students of UHCL to ensure its passing.
It is the duty of UHCL’s students to vote and do their part to ensure this long overdue building comes to fruition. Otherwise, the university’s current students themselves will risk doing a great disservice to the future students of UHCL.
With the addition of a residence hall and a recreation and wellness center, a student center is not the icing on the cake but the foundational cake itself to give UHCL the traditional feel it has spent years striving toward.